Talk:Documentary: Missionary Positions

@Arnoud - I think this might need explaining to give it context... Why do we have it here etc. With no text next to it, it looks a bit like x-rated spam at first glance. I think it needs some contextualisation for it's relevancy to YWAM and our missionary outreach!--Kev-The-Hasty 19:43, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

@Kevin - Agreed! Got to work on it. Put it on the first thing to do on my to-do-list. Thanks for keeping your eye out on spammers. Arnoud van Dillewijn 14:19, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * @Arnoud - thanks for looking into this. I must say that I still feel uncomfortable about this material. Could we chat some more about this? It is just that it could be easily perceived as being the opposite to what it is. Also it is not quite clear of the CONTEXT of the material - why is it on the KB, what purpose does it serve etc. Actually it might work better as a link from a written article than deserving a page to frame the video... What do you think? --Kev-The-Hasty 20:40, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

@Kevin - There is still more work to be done. I wasn't finished yet. But the warnings are there for a purpose. For some Christians it is quite shocking. But I think this is really useful for YWAM, because these 2 guys take the gospel to a place no one else went before. It is relevant in the way we think about missions. I learned lots by watching this documentary. To make it only a written article takes away the multimedia function. I did look for a trailer that might fit better, but some how that was not possible. Anyway, I will write more. If we ever get hate-mail, well, than we can change the whole page. Arnoud van Dillewijn 09:09, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

@Arnoud: It is not that we need warnings, just that we need an explanation of why this is relevant to YWAM, how it will equip YWAMers to help disciple. At the moment we are showcasing their video, without this context; it is part of our site if you will. If we had some text explaining the relevance we could link out to the video. I think it could be more relevant as a link out in a general piece on ministering to sexually broken people as a link to helpful external material. As it stands now, I am uncomfortable with this as can also be interpreted as if this was YWAM and the way we do things... --Kev-The-Hasty 14:18, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * @arnoud part 2 - Just been thinking we ought to merge this page as a link into Ministering to Sexual Brokenness (I renamed this page from "Sex Issues"). I would advise we merge Debate:_XXXchurch:_Nightline_Porn_Debate_(Ron_Jeremy_vs_Craig_Gross) in too as this provides the best context. I will also ask Mark Vening for some input into this area as he has been doing good work ministering into brokenness.
 * @Kevin part 3, looks great! I really like the idea and the renaming. It is fun to see that throwing out ideas get shaped and become better. I did think about the picture with the feet. It is a dutch picture used to grade movies. The R, tells all English speakers enough. If the page ever gets translated in Dutch it can be used there. The Dutch people know the context. By the way, did you already check out the link I placed and watched the documentary? Blessings Arnoud van Dillewijn 10:44, 11 February 2011 (UTC)